Evaluating complex interventions in end of life care: the MORECare statement on good practice generated by a synthesis of transparent expert consultations and systematic reviews

Reporting guidelines are recommendations to help write up research clearly.

Your research will be used by people from different disciplines and backgrounds for decades to come. Reporting guidelines are community-created recommendations for describing what you did and what you found so that everyone can understand, repeat, apply, and synthesise your work. Although they recommend information to include in your manuscript, they don’t dictate how to order that information.

Most reporting guidelines consist of the full guidance (sometimes called an Explanation and Elaboration document) and a checklist. The full guidance provides detailed explanations and examples for each item, and the checklist allows you to demonstrate adherence to editors.

You can use reporting guidelines throughout your research process. However you use reporting guidelines, please cite them.

Writing manuscripts

Write confidently using a reporting guideline to quickly turn a blank page into a thorough and impactful manuscript.

Checking

Use a reporting checklist to demonstrate to an editor or peer reviewer that you have included everything. Many journals require completed checklists at submission.

Writing applications

Reporting guidelines can help you write funding applications, ethics applications, and protocols, but they won’t make design decisions for you!

Reporting guidelines are neither design nor quality appraisal tools.

Although reporting guidelines recommend information to include when writing up research, they do not mandate how to design research. Similarly, when reviewing literature, although you can use reporting guidelines to assess whether a manuscript is well reported, you cannot use them to appraise whether that study is well designed.

Key information

Reporting guideline acronym

MORECare

Provided for

Research evaluating services and treatments in end of life care

Relevant URLs (full-text if available)

PubMed ID

Downloads

Bibliographic reference

Commonly used reporting guidelines

STROBE Observational Studies
PRISMA Systematic reviews of trials
PRISMA-P Systematic review protocols
CONSORT Randomised trials
SPIRIT Randomised trial protocols
SRQR Qualitative Research
CARE Case Reports
STARD Diagnostic studies
TRIPOD+AI Prediction Models
ARRIVE Animal Research
SQUIRE Quality Improvement
CHEERS Economic Evaluations
Search all

Higginson IJ, Evans CJ, Grande G, Preston N, Morgan M, McCrone P, Lewis P, Fayers P, Harding R, Hotopf M, Murray SA, Benalia H, Gysels M, Farquhar M, Todd C; MORECare. Evaluating complex interventions in end of life care: the MORECare statement on good practice generated by a synthesis of transparent expert consultations and systematic reviews. BMC Med. 2013;24;11:111.

Additional information

Language

English

Availability in additional languages

Study design

  • Experimental studies
  • Mixed methods studies
  • Observational studies

Clinical area

  • Palliative care

Applies to the whole report or to individual sections of the report?

  • Ethical issues (consent etc.)
  • Outcomes (variables)
  • Procedure/Method
  • Statistical methods and analyses
  • Study characteristics (participants etc.)

Reporting guideline website URL

Previous versions of this guideline / Guideline history

Other

Further information is available from: MORECare Statement

Additional Information

The following papers have also been published by the MORECare researchers:
Preston NJ, Fayers P, Walters SJ, Pilling M, Grande GE, Short V, Owen-Jones E, Evans CJ, Benalia H, Higginson IJ, Todd CJ; MORECare. Recommendations for managing missing data, attrition and response shift in palliative and end-of-life care research: part of the MORECare research method guidance on statistical issues. Palliat Med. 2013;27(10):899-907. PMID: 23652842
Evans CJ, Benalia H, Preston NJ, Grande G, Gysels M, Short V, Daveson BA, Bausewein C, Todd C, Higginson IJ; MORECare. The selection and use of outcome measures in palliative and end-of-life care research: the MORECare International Consensus Workshop. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013;46(6):925-37. PMID: 23628515
Gysels M, Evans CJ, Lewis P, Speck P, Benalia H, Preston NJ, Grande GE, Short V, Owen-Jones E, Todd CJ, Higginson IJ. MORECare research methods guidance development: recommendations for ethical issues in palliative and end-of-life care research. Palliat Med. 2013;27(10):908-17. PMID: 23695828
Farquhar M, Preston N, Evans CJ, Grande G, Short V, Benalia H, Higginson IJ, Todd C; MOREcare. Mixed methods research in the development and evaluation of complex interventions in palliative and end-of-life care: report on the MORECare consensus exercise. J Palliat Med. 2013;16(12):1550-1560. PMID: 24195755